<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>FGI Research &#187; thought leadership</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fgiresearch.com/tag/thought-leadership/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fgiresearch.com</link>
	<description>for a changing world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 15:59:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Effects of Order Bias on Price Elasticity Measurement</title>
		<link>http://www.fgiresearch.com/insights/the-effects-of-order-bias-on-price-elasticity-measurement.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.fgiresearch.com/insights/the-effects-of-order-bias-on-price-elasticity-measurement.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 13:56:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Insights in Action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market research analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research experts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thought leadership]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nemargut.com/fgitest/?p=1438</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a recent survey, FGI measured the potential price impact ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a title="Tweet This!" href="http://twitter.com/home?status=How does order bias impact price elasticity? Learn from the research experts: http://bit.ly/czoAiz via @fgiresearch" target="_blank"><img class="alignright" src="http://www.fgiresearch.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/tweetthis.png" alt="" width="62" height="53" /></a><span style="font-weight: normal;">In a recent survey, FGI measured the potential price impact of including recycled content in a paper product that had not previously been available with this content.  The intent was to measure the degree to which there was a change in respondents&#8217; expectations of price based on this alternative content.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: normal;">Traditionally, surveys are designed to present price options on a basic scale, without methodological regard to the order in which the price deltas are presented to the respondents.  In this survey, a random half of the respondents were presented the pricing variation choices from low-to-high (i.e. 30% less to 30% more), and the other half were presented the price variations in the opposite order (30% more to 30% less).</span><span id="more-1438"></span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: normal;"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-2784" src="http://www.fgiresearch.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/Dinos-graph.jpg" alt="" width="582" height="366" />Data from the “low-to-high” respondents skewed toward paying <span style="text-decoration: underline;">less</span> for the product, while data from the “high to low” respondents skewed toward paying <span style="text-decoration: underline;">more</span> for the products.  The same number said “about the same” in both cases; “about the same” was the midpoint of each scale. This finding reflects  a classic example of order bias.</span></p>
<p><strong>Dino Fire<br />
Director, Marketing Science<br />
FGI Research</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fgiresearch.com/insights/the-effects-of-order-bias-on-price-elasticity-measurement.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

