<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>FGI Research &#187; news media</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fgiresearch.com/tag/news-media/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fgiresearch.com</link>
	<description>for a changing world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 15:59:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Print Media Declines, but is it Dead?</title>
		<link>http://www.fgiresearch.com/trendtruth/print-media-declines-but-is-it-dead-2.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.fgiresearch.com/trendtruth/print-media-declines-but-is-it-dead-2.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 01:17:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[TrendTruth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer behavior]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[print media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nemargut.com/fgitest/?p=1390</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Online content is gaining ground, aided by the release of ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Online content is gaining ground, aided by the release of e-readers like the iPad, and it has hurt some print publications; but others are going strong, and three-quarters of consumers say they don’t want print media to disappear entirely.</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://twitter.com/home?status=Is the end of print upon us? Consumers say no. http://bit.ly/b0psGx via @fgiresearch" title="Tweet This!" target="_blank"><img class="alignright" src="http://www.fgiresearch.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/tweetthis.png" alt="" width="62" height="53" /></a><span style="font-weight: normal;">Most media leaders concur that print media is floundering. Trends in technology, communication and markets reflect that fact (Steve Jobs just ushered in the next wave of online content readers with Apple’s <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iEiUlf9BAYU">iPad</a>). An entire genre of journalism seems to have emerged just to cover the decline, not only in print but <a href="http://www.newspaperdeathwatch.com/">online</a>. According to the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/12/business/media/12pew.html">New York Times</a>, sixty-two percent of journalists think the Internet has forever altered their profession’s principles, eroding the standards of good journalism and the relevance of print publications alike. Still, new data from FGI Research indicates that print may yet have an audience. While 67% of consumers surveyed say they see a decline in the use of print versus other types of media to stay informed, 74% say they “would <em>not</em> prefer that online publications eventually replace print publications completely.”</span> <span id="more-1390"></span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: normal;">Subscriptions to and circulation of print media first began to drop in the 1920’s, when print started competing with radio for audience. The rise of television put a bigger dent in newspaper market share and ad revenue. But high-speed Internet has by far been the biggest threat to traditional print media, since online publishers offer content in a variety of formats that are not only easy to access but, for the most part, free. FGI Research asked consumers to tell us where they get their information, what they think about the decline of print media and whether they would be willing to pay for online subscriptions.<br />
</span></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="425" height="350" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/IQSKRWXyFw8&amp;feature" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="350" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/IQSKRWXyFw8&amp;feature"></embed></object></p>
<p style="text-align: center;">Rupert Murdoch comments on the rapid change in communication technologies.</p>
<p><span style="font-weight: normal;"><strong>Where News Comes From</strong><br />
Notwithstanding the rash of stories about how online sources threaten print, FGI’s data show that 1 in 3 (33%) consumers still use print publications “most often” to stay in-the-know, compared to 28% who use online content most often. 39% use both equally often.</span></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-weight: normal;"><strong>“Which of the following sources do you rely on for information?”</strong></span></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-weight: normal;"><img class="alignnone" src="http://www.fgiresearch.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/preferredmediasource.png" alt="" width="603" height="369" /></span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: normal;">Meanwhile, two thirds (69%) of respondents say they “use online publications to supplement print publications,” while 20% say they rely solely on online sources for information. 11% say they never use online sources. These results indicate that, while consumers may turn to online content for some information, they have not abandoned print altogether. Indeed, some do not even use online sources. It follows that traditional media still has a market. In fact, a little over half of consumers (52%) said they purchased print sources from newsstands and stores, compared to 48% who did not.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: normal;"><strong>Consumers Still Read Some Print</strong><br />
This begs the question: what <em>kinds </em>of print media do readers use? In terms of subscribers, local newspapers and national magazines are the most popular, with 52% of consumers saying they subscribe to local newspapers and 46% saying they subscribe to at least one national magazine. Some print sources clearly are not experiencing the same losses as others. However, other print sources are in big trouble.</span></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-weight: normal;"><strong>“What kinds of print media do you subscribe to and pay for?”</strong></span></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-weight: normal;"><img class="alignnone" src="http://www.fgiresearch.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/printsubscriptions.png" alt="" width="617" height="363" /></span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: normal;"><strong>National Newspapers, Local Magazines Lag</strong><br />
According to the graph above, only 10% of consumers surveyed subscribe to a national newspaper. 11% say they subscribe to at least one local magazine. Meanwhile, 29% say they neither subscribe to nor pay for any kind of print media, though that does not guarantee that those consumers use online sources instead (they may simply not look at the news at all). Even so, the data suggests that some print sources have been hit harder than others.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: normal;"><strong>Online Subscription Fees Not the Solution</strong><br />
Most readers use both online and print sources for information. Two thirds use online content to <em>supplement</em> print. This is partly the reason why print newspapers are worried about declining readership. Consumer opinion suggests they are becoming less relevant –and that they do not provide everything consumers want to read. Declining ad revenues and profits exacerbate newspapers’ anxiety.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: normal;">At the same time, subscription fees are not attractive to media consumers. National newspapers like the <em>New York Times</em>, <em>Washington Post</em>, and <em>Los Angeles Times</em>, whose print readership has declined, but whose online content is king, have considered charging an online subscriber fee to stay afloat. But FGI Research’s data show they would have some convincing to do: 70% of consumers say they are unwilling to pay a fee for online content. Indeed, part of the attraction of online content –at least until now –has been the fact that it costs nothing.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: normal;"><strong>The Search for the Perfect Subscriber Fee</strong><br />
Even if they had to pay to read, the vast majority of consumers (87%) say they “should be charged less than what [they] pay for print publications,” because of perceived lower production costs. Since “publishers aren’t spending money on paper/printing,” readers believe they should not have to pay a price reflective of those costs. Only 10% think they should pay “as much as” they pay for print subscriptions because they consider the services “comparable.” The remaining 3% think they should pay “more than what [they] pay for print publications” because of the wider array of information available. For the most part, consumers are opposed to the idea of paying for online content. This puts today’s print media in a bind. How can they satisfy all of their readers while generating enough revenue to turn a profit and satisfy shareholders?</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: normal;"><strong>Actionable Insights</strong><br />
Declines in subscription, circulation and other performance measures have given today’s print media plenty of reasons to worry. However, FGI Research’s study indicates that they may still have an audience. As for how to respond to readers who have migrated online, while consumers may balk at the idea of a subscriber fee, some may sign on at the right price (less than what they pay for print). Overall, this data gives the print media industry some hope for the future –if they act now. How should publishers respond?</span></p>
<ul>
<li>Conduct research to find out what demographics use which sources, and organize content accordingly. Target your content and publications for the right audiences.</li>
<li>Using qualitative as well as quantitative data, find out the ideal price of an online subscriber fee. Begin testing now.</li>
<li>Use qualitative data to find out what draws readers to one publication over another, and respond to those data to maximize readership no matter where you publish. Use qualitative data to fuel future quantitative studies.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Next Steps You Can Take</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><span style="font-weight: normal;">Learn more about the results of this study: complimentary      access to the data in this report, including cross-tabulated results, is      available upon request from FGI Research.</span></li>
<li><span style="font-weight: normal;">Contact FGI Research: click <a href="http://www.fgiresearch.com/wp-content/themes/wp-creativix/contact.php">here</a> or call us at (919) 929-7759</span></li>
<li><span style="font-weight: normal;">Explore FGI Research’s <a href="http://www.fgiresearch.com/solutions">market research solutions</a>,      including <a href="http://www.fgiresearch.com/solutions/panels/custom-panels/">custom      panels</a>, <a href="http://www.fgiresearch.com/research">full      service research</a>, and our <a href="http://www.fgiresearch.com/solutions/panels/smartpanel">online      sample</a> (SmartPanel).</span></li>
<li><span style="font-weight: normal;">Join FGI Research’s <a href="http://ld.fgiresearch.com/fgireportbuilder/sp/" target="_blank">online      panel</a> to participate in future studies.</span></li>
</ul>
<p><span style="font-weight: normal;"><strong><br />
Survey Methods</strong><br />
Respondents: 300<br />
Date of Survey: April 7th-14th, 2010<br />
Sample Source: <strong>FGI SmartPanel</strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: normal;">This nationally-representative sample consists of adults aged 18 and up and is balanced to the US population using recent census data. One can say with 95% confidence that the maximum margin of sampling error is ±4 percentage points.</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fgiresearch.com/trendtruth/print-media-declines-but-is-it-dead-2.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Social Media Makes Impact on Global News Feeds</title>
		<link>http://www.fgiresearch.com/trendtruth/social-media-makes-impact-on-global-news-feeds.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.fgiresearch.com/trendtruth/social-media-makes-impact-on-global-news-feeds.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 21:56:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[TrendTruth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer behavior]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nemargut.com/fgitest/?p=1331</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Turn on the news and you can see footage from ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://twitter.com/home?status=How does social media impact mainstream news? http://bit.ly/dhONsX via @fgiresearch" title="Tweet This!" target="_blank"><img class="alignright" src="http://www.fgiresearch.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/tweetthis.png" alt="" width="62" height="53" /></a><span style="font-weight: normal;">Turn on the news and you can see footage from YouTube. Most media outlets not only have websites but corporate blogs, Facebook pages and Twitter presence. As an example of how social media impacts the news, the June 16 coverage of the Iranian election dominated the discussion on Twitter. Twitter, a real time social media platform, is, according to the NY Times, “one of the fastest-growing phenomena on the Internet.” According to data collected by FGI Research on June 28, 2009, 20% of Americans currently have an account with Twitter. Which begs the question: Does Twitter have a big enough credible presence to affect the news?</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: normal;"><strong>Consumer Opinion on Social Media</strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: normal;">FGI Research has concluded that 51% of Americans believe that Social Media sites, like Twitter, affect the news. National news networks like CNN or FOX news use Twitter regularly to report how the country feels about different topics. Social media is an interactive forum that makes it quick and easy to generate immediate feedback. It is a quick, convenient barometer for the media to interpret the sentiment of a large sample of Americans. <span id="more-1331"></span>What&#8217;s more, it is another outlet for media to publicize their content. 29% of all respondents said that they use social media sites, like Twitter, to follow the news; and of those, 46% said that they find the same amount or more news on social media sites than they did last year.</span></p>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="425" height="350" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/0kjkoGrjM7k" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="350" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/0kjkoGrjM7k"></embed></object></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: normal;"><strong>The News Also Impacts Social Media</strong><br />
It’s not a stretch to say that the increased attention in the national news has boosted Twitter’s membership. According to our study, Twitter is growing: 17% of respondents, who are not currently users, say that they plan on creating an account within the next 6 months. This means that, according to our data, Twitter is growing faster than MySpace, YouTube, FriendFeed, LinkedIn, and Flicker. In fact, microblogging is becoming a breakout form for reaching large audiences in an inexpensive way to make updates in real time.</span></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-605" title="TT002" src="http://www.fgiresearch.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/TT002.png" alt="TT002" width="480" height="312" /></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: normal;"><strong>Actionable Insights</strong><br />
What does the relationship between social media and news mean for businesses? As we said, social media offers a quick, free and easy way to reach out to consumers for marketing. It also offers a barometer of consumer opinion. Using advanced research methods and mining tools, companies can trawl social media for insight into consumer opinions &#8211;opinions they might not readily share in a survey or even an online community. It is vital to not only talk to consumers through social media but to listen to what they are saying in order to create more effective business and marketing strategies. Social media won&#8217;t just have an impact on the news. It will impact the entire market. </span></p>
<p><strong>Next Steps You Can Take</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Learn more about the results of this study: complimentary access to the data in this report, including cross-tabulated results, is available upon request from FGI Research.</li>
<li>Contact FGI Research: click <a href="http://www.fgiresearch.com/wp-content/themes/wp-creativix/contact.php">here</a> or call us at (919) 929-7759</li>
<li>Explore FGI Research’s <a href="http://www.fgiresearch.com/solutions">market research solutions</a>, including <a href="http://www.fgiresearch.com/solutions/panels/custom-panels/">custom panels</a>, <a href="http://www.fgiresearch.com/research">full service research</a>, and our <a href="http://www.fgiresearch.com/solutions/panels/smartpanel">online sample</a> (SmartPanel).</li>
<li>Join FGI Research’s <a href="http://ld.fgiresearch.com/fgireportbuilder/sp/" target="_blank">online panel</a> to participate in future studies.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Survey Methods</strong><br />
<span style="font-weight: normal;">Date of Study: 6/29/2009<br />
Total Responders: 315<br />
Sample Source:<strong>FGI SmartPanel</strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: normal;">This nationally-representative sample consists of adults aged 18 and up and is balanced to the US population using recent census data. One can say with 95% confidence that the maximum margin of sampling error is ±4 percentage points.</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fgiresearch.com/trendtruth/social-media-makes-impact-on-global-news-feeds.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

