Popular association with poor quality and “looking cheap” have often kept store brands (private label products) from enjoying broad acceptance and sustained market share. There is even a lingering perception among some consumers that “store brands” equate to “generics,” an antiquated association to be sure. Yet store brands also have a universal reputation for saving consumers money. Data from a recent FGI study shows that 97% of US consumers believe “store brands cost less than national brands.”

Our findings suggest that consumers are poised to expand their purchases of store brands. Not only do a third of those surveyed buy more store brands than they did a year ago, but 1 in 4 plans to increase his or her store brand purchases in the future. As this CBS report reveals, even brand loyalists are open to switching to store brands, especially when the perceived quality is as good as, or better than, the national brand.

A Massive Market is at Stake
Of the $500 billion dollars that United States consumers spend yearly across all categories, store brands claim only 17% ($84 billion), but that share is growing –and national brands large and small have felt the shift. Store brand sales have even seen gains in categories that national manufacturers used to consider “safe,” like baby food, feminine hygiene, health and beauty products, household cleaning goods, and oral care, among others. The change is less surprising when you look at other markets around the world. In Western Europe, for instance, the market share of store brands is 2-3 times larger than that of national brands. As American consumers’ habits start to mirror this tendency, American companies are responding: Target plans to add another 100 products to their “UP & UP” brand in 2010.

Store Brand Quality Catches Up
FGI Research asked US consumers how they view the quality of store brands vs. name brands. Specifically, we asked how much they agreed with this statement: “The quality of store-brand products is just as good as name brand products.” A full two thirds (65%) of consumers said they “strongly agree” or “agreed somewhat.” Furthermore, four out of five (79%) consumers strongly agree or agree somewhat that “store-brand products are an excellent value for the money.”

“Store Brands are Just as High-Quality as Name Brands”

These data suggest strong consumer confidence in store brands on questions of quality and value. On the whole, consumers view store-brand products as comparable in quality to name brands. Given the 97% who believe store brands are less expensive than name brands, and the more than 60% who believe store-brand products give them a good value for the price, it follows that switching from name brand to store brand may be one way consumers can save money without sacrificing quality. But how many will actually make the switch? FGI answered that question with some data about purchasing habits.

Store Brand Purchases Pick Up
Over a third (35%) of consumers said they were buying more store brands than a year ago. Asked to project their purchasing habits for the next year, 25% said they plan to increase their consumption of store brands. These results support industry predictions that store brand growth will be 13% annually. Should the US growth rate reach half of these levels, store brands could capture another $5 billion per year in consumer spending. This is a healthy “trial” statistic; retaining that share of wallet will ultimately depend on consistency of store brands’ competitive quality and pricing.

Grocery Store Brands Fare Best
FGI Research asked a few specific questions about store-brand food products (groceries). Up to 79% of consumers believed store-brand food products were “just as nutritious as name brands.” A larger percentage (83%) was willing to serve store-brand food products to family members. Meanwhile, 63% of consumers said they were “extremely likely” or “somewhat likely” to buy store-brand food products compared to national brands, while only 15%  said they were “extremely unlikely” or  “somewhat unlikely.”

“Thinking Only of Food Products, How Likely are You to Buy Store-Brand?”

Store Brands Gain Traction Across Categories
Store brands consumers were most likely to buy included food, household goods, and “general merchandise” (a broad category that encompassed seasonal items, school supplies, automotive needs, etc). Hair care products, over-the-counter drugs and baby care also fared well. Consumers were less likely to spend on store-brand apparel and home goods like appliances.

“In which of the following categories do you purchase store-brand products?”

Actionable Insights
This FGI Research study demonstrates growing consumer confidence in the quality, price and value of store-brand products, confidence which translates into higher consumption of store brands. Consumers are likelier to purchase store-brand food, household items, general merchandise, and health and beauty (less so home goods and apparel). So, what are some key actions to consider based on these findings?

1. Retailers and manufacturers should continue to invest in store-brand offerings. These products usually bring higher margins for retailers and significant gains are possible with the proper research, product development and marketing.
2. Some store brands’ packaging might need improvement. High quality, professional packaging and attractive pricing will drive sales.
3. National brands must stay abreast of consumer preferences and behaviors, especially as regards leading store-brand offerings. Further erosion of their market share is likely without aggressive research, product development and real differentiation, and marketing.
4. Private label manufacturers must remain aware of quality concerns to maintain their strong performance relative to national brands and even enhance their competitive edge. This means robust marketing and packaging research and conscientious response to consumer preferences.

Next Steps You Can Take

Survey Methods
Respondents: 367
Date of Survey: February 26th-28th, 2010
Sample Source: FGI SmartPanel

This nationally-representative sample consists of adults aged 18 and up and is balanced to the US population using recent census data. One can say with 95% confidence that the maximum margin of sampling error is ±4 percentage points.

We’ve all seen eye-popping statistics about the growth of social media. They read like this…

• “If MySpace was a country, it would be the 5^th largest in the world.”
• “In 2006 there were 2.7 billion Google searches per month; today, there are 31 billion.”
• “The first commercial text message was sent in December of 1992, now the number of text messages sent every day exceeds the population of the planet.”

And the list goes on. To be sure, there is a tremendous amount of online activity, but does it reach your target market, and more importantly, does it influence them? In our latest TrendTruth, FGI Research set out to determine the current reach and influence of social media’s newest star, Twitter.

Twitter: an Introduction
Twitter is a simple social networking channel whereby members can “Tweet” about themselves, and tune in to other Tweets using any device that can access the Internet. Twitter is making its mark on the Internet this year, boasting just over 5 million members. However, recent media studies indicate that Twitter’s audience retention rate currently lags behind Facebook and MySpace. So, while Twitter’s long term audience size is unclear, FGI Research sought out to understand a few critical things about today’s Twitter audience. Among other things, we asked of Twitter users the following: 1) who do you follow, and 2) do they influence you? Our research yielded several compelling findings.

How Consumers Use Twitter
Among Twitter users, over 80% actively follow other people. The majority of people they follow are friends, family members and celebrities. However, a significant number of Twitter users also follow businesses (38%), other organizations (23%) and political figures (29%). If these trends hold during Twitter’s audience growth phase, Twitter may become a table-stakes communications channel for businesses and other organizations to reach their target markets. But will this channel influence their target markets?

How Does Twitter Influence Purchases
Among Twitter users who follow other people and organizations, the channel does appear to have an emerging, albeit not overwhelming influence on their opinions and purchase decisions. Below are the top two box (high influence and very high influence) percentages for several important categories:

• 26% are influenced in their selection of restaurants
• 23% are influenced in their purchase of electronics
• 20% are influenced in their political opinions
• 17% are influenced in their purchase of household goods
• 16% are influenced in their purchase of groceries
• 16% are influenced in their purchase of clothing
• 14% are influenced in their purchase of automobiles

Who Uses Twitter?
Of course, every business and organization is different with respect to their products, services and target audiences. Some industries must implement Twitter initiatives more quickly than others. When determining if your audience is right for Twitter, a simple first step should be a demographic analysis of Twitter users. The chart below provides a breakout of Twitter users by age, income, and gender.

Actionable Insights
As with any area of research, the “Twitter question” has the potential to spark a lot more debate and will no doubt inspire further inquiries. As for what you can do with this data right now, try to keep in mind the audience that is already on Twitter. Shape your marketing efforts to reflect that knowledge. And when you want to learn more about who your followers are, what they want to know, and how you can target their needs, turn to robust and innovative research techniques: online survey data, social media monitoring, and human research experts who will uncover the real meaning of all that data.

Next Steps You Can Take

Survey Methods
Date of Study: 12/21/2009
Total Responders: 276
Sample Source: FGI SmartPanel

When FGI Research asked women what they thought the most effective message in advertising geared toward them was, the results were quite clear.  33.67% of respondents thought that the most effective advertising showed that the “product or service will save them time and/or money”, and 23.91% thought that “showing the usefulness of the product or service” was the most influencing.  Surprisingly, only 9.43% of respondents thought that “showing how the product or service will benefit their family” would send the most enticing message, and the two least appealing campaigns showed how a product or service would “make life easier” and portrayed the product or service as having “high quality and value”.

Advertisers would be wise to use humor to get through to women, but not at the expense of men.  43.8% of women said that ads that are funny appeals to them most, but only 2.4% of women showed interest in ads that “make fun of men”.  In addition, women were attracted to ads that “empower women” and “trigger an emotional response”; while only a minuscule number of women thought that a “sexy” ad would get their attention.

Actionable Insights
What can we learn from this study? Above all, that men and women respond to different kinds of advertising. Reaching women effectively requires a whole other body of research, preferably one that reflects targeted sampling and comprehensive survey data. Holistic research, customized to fit the requirements of a given situation, can inform our understanding as marketers and help us respond to women’s desires as consumers. The difference between an ad campaign that falls short and one that hits the mark with women can be found in the opinions of women themselves, accessed through the most robust research techniques.

Next Steps You Can Take

Survey Methods
Date of Study: 11/11/2009
Total Responders: 297
Sample Source: FGI SmartPanel

• They will spend more for goods and services of higher quality (65% food, 57% clothing, 56% facial skin care)
• They demand products that deliver: time savings, fulfilling experiences, and emotional benefits
• They give examples of brands that consistently meet their needs: Coach, Crème de la Mer, Adidas, Apple and Nike

Our advice: keep your research sharply focused on the wants and needs of women as they related to your specific products and services. Otherwise, you may find yourself on the outside looking in on the very people who control the majority of every dollar that is spent.

David Wilson
CEO
FGI Research