<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Online Research Getting Tested By Big Spenders</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fgiresearch.com/online-research-getting-tested-by-big-spenders/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fgiresearch.com/online-research-getting-tested-by-big-spenders/</link>
	<description>Research for a better world.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2010 19:41:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rob Killough, Project Manager</title>
		<link>http://www.fgiresearch.com/online-research-getting-tested-by-big-spenders/comment-page-1/#comment-133</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Killough, Project Manager</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 22:12:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fgiresearch.com/?p=615#comment-133</guid>
		<description>You are spot on, Wesley.  Clients want the cheapest, fastest, and best quality for everything.  The problem is, you can&#039;t always get all 3!!  While the web survey is certainly the cheapest and fastest, no matter what quality control practices you implement to catch the &#039;professional surveytakers&#039;, you will always have some measure of data quality compromised.  In the end, cheaper sometimes just yields cheaper results -- the best practice for marketing researchers in the future will involve multi-modal approaches utilizing online communities, quantitative web/phone/mail studies, online focus groups, etc...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are spot on, Wesley.  Clients want the cheapest, fastest, and best quality for everything.  The problem is, you can&#8217;t always get all 3!!  While the web survey is certainly the cheapest and fastest, no matter what quality control practices you implement to catch the &#8216;professional surveytakers&#8217;, you will always have some measure of data quality compromised.  In the end, cheaper sometimes just yields cheaper results &#8212; the best practice for marketing researchers in the future will involve multi-modal approaches utilizing online communities, quantitative web/phone/mail studies, online focus groups, etc&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wesley</title>
		<link>http://www.fgiresearch.com/online-research-getting-tested-by-big-spenders/comment-page-1/#comment-120</link>
		<dc:creator>Wesley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 13:51:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fgiresearch.com/?p=615#comment-120</guid>
		<description>Good post. I agree. Many studies yield flawed results when cost is the only sample/mode decision driver. Sometimes the nature of the custom research / full service research study requires RDD phone sample even when it&#039;s twice the cost of a web study. Other times, web sample is fine. In still other cases, the web might be best but you can only get the sample via phone. Finally, a custom panel can be a great source of sample for the right types of studies. In the end, you need to trust your marketing research partner to make sample/mode recommendations based on what&#039;s best for your study, not just offering the lowest cost.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good post. I agree. Many studies yield flawed results when cost is the only sample/mode decision driver. Sometimes the nature of the custom research / full service research study requires RDD phone sample even when it&#8217;s twice the cost of a web study. Other times, web sample is fine. In still other cases, the web might be best but you can only get the sample via phone. Finally, a custom panel can be a great source of sample for the right types of studies. In the end, you need to trust your marketing research partner to make sample/mode recommendations based on what&#8217;s best for your study, not just offering the lowest cost.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
