From the Brick…

In 1984, Motorola unveiled the first cellular phone: nicknamed “the brick,” it weighed two pounds, offered a half-hour of talk time per battery charge and sold for $3,995. In twenty-six years, mobile technology has transformed at warp speed. Not only are most devices the size of matchbooks, but phones are inexpensive and readily available. Some boast a battery life of up to a week, and features like games, unlimited texts, and Internet are standard. Through texting, many companies have found a new avenue for marketing to consumers. Some users have even started to shop online –with their phones. FGI turned to SmartPanel to get insight in this trend.

… to the Boutique
Among those surveyed, 59.67% reported that their phones had Internet, whereas 40.33% did not. When we drilled down the data by provider, the percentage of customers with Internet sometimes jumped as high as 75.9% (with Sprint) or 70.9% (with AT&T).¹ Across the board, customers believed the Internet connection on their phones was secure. When asked if they felt safe using mobile Internet to make a purchase, 87.93% answered “yes.” Customers’ overall faith in the web that they accessed through their phones may help explain the purchasing habits of those who used the technology to shop.

However, not as many customers were shopping online with their phones as their level of comfort might portend. As many as 67.6% of respondents said they did not use their phones for online purchases. Even among mobile customers who had Internet, the number of respondents who shopped online through their phones was relatively low. Nevertheless, the 32.4% of users who said they did shop online were making purchases in a range of categories.

What they Bought
Most (81.03%) were buying apps for their smartphones. Yet respondents also purchased other products, including electronics, clothes, shoes and accessories, books, food, and household items. Some said they also looked up information about what cars to buy. The industries that dominated were fashion, books, electronics and food. All of this data begs the question: who is the customer here?

Who’s Buying
The majority of those who shopped with their phones, up to 67.2%, were male. 32.8% were female. When women did use their phones to make purchases, they spent most of their money on household goods or on clothes, shoes and accessories. Men, meanwhile, spent a fair penny on food, books and electronics.

A breakdown in terms of income revealed even more about these mobile shoppers. Nearly two-fifths were in an income bracket between $75k and $100k. One fifth was in the bracket of $100k or more. A little over 30% made between $20,000 and $75,000 a year.

What they Spent
No matter who was shopping, customers tended to use their phones for small purchases: 43.1% of those surveyed said they spent less than $50 per month, and 24.14% reported that they spent between $51 and $100. A few said that they spent as much as $200-$300 on purchases through their phones. Among these, most were spending money on food (33.3%), automotive goods (30.0%), or clothes and accessories (27.8%).

Actionable Insights
Ultimately, the diversity of purchases that customers made through their phones –buying not just apps but tangible goods and services –indicates that this trend should influence how companies adapt their marketing plans to respond to mobile technology. By finding out what customers shop online, which ones use their phones to shop online, and what they buy, multiple industries can move towards marketing efforts aimed at this demographic. The way to gain an edge in the emerging mobile market is by using top-notch research methods. One thing is for sure: both mobile Internet and online shopping are here to stay. As the former becomes more ubiquitous, the tendency to use phones for online purchases could increase, or at least stay steady. Further research would reveal even more insight into this possibility.

Next Steps You Can Take

• Learn more about the results of this study: complimentary access to the data in this report, including cross-tabulated results, is available upon request from FGI Research.
• Contact FGI Research: click here or call us at (919) 929-7759
• Explore FGI Research’s market research solutions, including custom panels, full service research, and our online sample (SmartPanel).
• Join FGI Research’s online panel to participate in future studies.

Survey Methods
Date of Study: 2/5/2010
Total Responders: 300
Sample Source: FGI SmartPanel

This nationally-representative sample consists of adults aged 18 and up and is balanced to the US population using recent census data. One can say with 95% confidence that the maximum margin of sampling error is ±4 percentage points.

1. We wanted to know what mobile providers respondents relied on and what features were on their phones. We found that the leading providers were Verizon and AT&T, while T-Mobile and Sprint claimed a smaller –though substantial –share of the market.

Michael Mauboussin, in his new book, Think Twice, advocates for a more measured approach to making certain decisions. He argues that we can put too much stock in our personal intuition and experience… and not enough in rigorous, fact-based, contemplative methods. Specifically, he calls us to engage the “wisdom of crowds,” which in the marketing research world means online communities and social media mining; statistical models, such as regression, conjoint, and MaxDiff; and best practices of data collection, which includes online surveys, custom online panels, RDD telephone data collection, and more.

Mauboussin believes that the Blink model is best left for use in predictable environments, where results from prior/similar decisions are well-known, and where we can see an obvious cause-and-effect relationship. While our gut instincts may be useful in such situations, Think Twice suggests that we more often find ourselves in situations that are totally new, where cause-and-effect models are not immediately obvious. As Mauboussin succinctly puts it: “Intuition is losing relevance in an increasingly complex world … more is different.”

So, who is right: my gut or my research? In these videos, the authors speak for themselves.

In my view, both Gladwell and Mauboussin make compelling cases for their views. Instant decision-making can serve us well in the right situations. When we’ve “seen this movie before,” we should confidently decide, act and move on. We can thump our chests and declare: “He who hesitates is lost.”

On the other hand, we must also acknowledge that we live in a complex and rapidly changing world. I have seen too many costly mistakes made because companies failed to invest in marketing research. They failed to seek the opinions and insights of the very customers whom they were in business to serve.

In order to successfully navigate this world, to choose correctly when we face our toughest decisions, we should take full advantage of the powerful marketing research tools and methods that are now at our disposal. We can use custom online panels, social media mining, online communities, quantitative models, prediction markets, and other advanced methods to inform our choices.

During these times, we’ll turn to the data, while calmly reminding those around us that: “Fools rush in where angels fear to tread.” Some days we’ll blink and others we’ll think twice. The trick is to know when to rush in and when to hesitate. Do you have an instant opinion about the issue…or to you need to conduct some more research?

David W. Wilson
CEO
FGI Research