<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>FGI Research &#187; 2009 &#187; August</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fgiresearch.com/2009/08/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fgiresearch.com</link>
	<description>for a changing world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 15:59:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>No News is Bad News</title>
		<link>http://www.fgiresearch.com/insights/no-news-is-bad-news.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.fgiresearch.com/insights/no-news-is-bad-news.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 14:14:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Insights in Action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[changing world]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer behavior]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online research methodologies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media analysis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nemargut.com/fgitest/?p=1443</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We’ve all heard the adage “no news is good news” ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-weight: normal;">We’ve all heard the adage “no news is good news” but is it?</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: normal;">Not today.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: normal;">If you’re not being discussed online, something’s up.  Whether it’s about your latest product, recently published research report, or company, or if it’s positive, neutral, or negative feedback you <em>want</em> to have your fair share of the social media pie.  If people are talking about you online then that means you can directly tap into what your customers (and potential customers) are saying about you – with <em>no censorship</em>.</span><span id="more-1443"></span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: normal;">This easy access to your customers’ opinions gives you an opportunity that businesses a generation ago didn’t have – the ability to respond almost immediately to questions, concerns, and responses to your business.  Whether the feedback is positive or negative you can respond accordingly and quickly.</span></p>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="425" height="350" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/gza8dvN8Hkc" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="350" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/gza8dvN8Hkc"></embed></object></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: normal;">So how do you dive into the social media pool?  Create accounts for your business – make a Facebook page, a Twitter account, Youtube videos, etc. and start publishing information about your business.  Invite clients and other business in your industries to be part of your networks.  Maintain dialogues (not monologues) with those people in your networks.  Respond quickly, succinctly, and efficiently to their feedback.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: normal;">In the world of social media, no news is bad news – start a conversation today!</span></p>
<p><strong>Emily Varney<br />
Social Media Intern<br />
FGI Research</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fgiresearch.com/insights/no-news-is-bad-news.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Do It Yourself: Men and Women Motivated by Different Factors</title>
		<link>http://www.fgiresearch.com/trendtruth/do-it-yourself-men-and-women-motivated-by-different-factors.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.fgiresearch.com/trendtruth/do-it-yourself-men-and-women-motivated-by-different-factors.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 23:18:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[TrendTruth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer behavior]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[demographics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DIY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gender]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nemargut.com/fgitest/?p=1344</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[FGI Research, in an effort to understand how homeowners are ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://twitter.com/home?status=Has the Recession caused an uptick in the number of DIYers? http://bit.ly/ax5LKF via @fgiresearch" title="Tweet This!" target="_blank"><img class="alignright" src="http://www.fgiresearch.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/tweetthis.png" alt="" width="62" height="53" /></a><span style="font-weight: normal;">FGI Research, in an effort to understand how homeowners are saving money this year, conducted an independent study on the subject of DIY projects.  Social media sites are full of information about how to do everything from simple at-home repairs to large DIY upgrades. American consumers reported that using social media sites greatly increased their ability to do DIY projects.  The social media sites they use most frequently include Facebook (29%), YouTube (24%), and personal blogs (15%).</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: normal;"><strong>Economic Downturn Causes Uptick in DIY</strong></span></p>
<p>Of people who do DIY projects regularly, 28% report doing more DIY projects now than they did 12 months ago. The frequency of people doing DIY projects is not only increasing because of the educational opportunities on the internet, but also because of the downturn in the economy.  In fact, 33% of DIYers said that they do more DIY projects specifically because of the down economy.  Furthermore, 58% of people who do DIY regularly said that part of their motivation is expense.<span id="more-1344"></span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: normal;"><strong>Gendered Motivations</strong><br />
Our analysts also looked at differences in DIY preferences by gender.  The majority of respondents who did ‘light DIY’ projects were women (69%); as opposed to those who said they do ‘medium and heavy’ levels of DIY, who were overwhelmingly male.  Furthermore, women had performed only 1-2 DIY projects in the past 12 months. Most men reported doing 3-5 or more in the same time. The reasons why people chose to do DIY projects also differed by gender.  25% of those who said that ‘completing DIY projects gives me a sense of satisfaction’ were male.  Of those who said their main motivation was expense, or that they ‘enjoy learning how to do DIY projects,&#8217; most were women.</span></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-598" title="TT004" src="http://www.fgiresearch.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/TT004.png" alt="TT004" width="600" height="397" /></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: normal;"><strong>Actionable Insights</strong><br />
It is important to note the differences in appeal to both men and women when thinking about the DIY market.  The main motivation behind a woman&#8217;s purchase of DIY products may be to save money or learn a new skill; a male consumer may simply be motivated by the sense of satisfaction he gets with a job well done.  This could influence how a business markets to each demographic. Research into the differences in gender demographics, using targeted sampling and specific survey questions, can help inform marketing plans to each gender.</span></p>
<p><strong>Next Steps You Can Take</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Learn more about the results of this study: complimentary access to the data in this report, including cross-tabulated results, is available upon request from FGI Research.</li>
<li>Contact FGI Research: click <a href="http://www.fgiresearch.com/wp-content/themes/wp-creativix/contact.php">here</a> or call us at (919) 929-7759</li>
<li>Explore FGI Research’s <a href="http://www.fgiresearch.com/solutions">market research solutions</a>, including <a href="http://www.fgiresearch.com/solutions/panels/custom-panels/">custom panels</a>, <a href="http://www.fgiresearch.com/research">full service research</a>, and our <a href="http://www.fgiresearch.com/solutions/panels/smartpanel">online sample</a> (SmartPanel).</li>
<li>Join FGI Research’s <a href="http://ld.fgiresearch.com/fgireportbuilder/sp/" target="_blank">online panel</a> to participate in future studies.</li>
</ul>
<p><span style="font-weight: normal;"> </span></p>
<p><strong>Survey Methods<br />
<span style="font-weight: normal;">Date of Study: 8/24/2009<br />
Total Responders: 259<br />
Sample Source:</span></strong> <strong>FGI SmartPanel</strong></p>
<p>This nationally-representative sample consists of adults aged 18 and up and is balanced to the US population using recent census data. One can say with 95% confidence that the maximum margin of sampling error is ±4 percentage points.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fgiresearch.com/trendtruth/do-it-yourself-men-and-women-motivated-by-different-factors.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What do Women Want?</title>
		<link>http://www.fgiresearch.com/insights/what-do-women-want-3.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.fgiresearch.com/insights/what-do-women-want-3.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 13:58:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Insights in Action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer behavior]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[demographics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Market research]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nemargut.com/fgitest/?p=1440</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to a new book from BCG&#8217;s Michael Silverstein, the ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://twitter.com/home?status=What do women want from advertisers? FGI Research has some insight... http://bit.ly/9NpVk1 via @fgiresearch" title="Tweet This!" target="_blank"><img class="alignright" src="http://www.fgiresearch.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/tweetthis.png" alt="" width="62" height="53" /></a><span style="font-weight: normal;">According to a new book from BCG&#8217;s Michael Silverstein, the earning and purchasing power of women is poised to explode over the next five years. Globally, women&#8217;s total earned income is projected to increase by $5 trillion, to $18 trillion, by 2014. That&#8217;s an increase of almost 40%. </span></p>
<p>To put it in perspective, the worldwide increase in women&#8217;s income will be greater than the economic expansion of China and India combined during the same period. Along with this spike in earning power, women will continue to drive spending across major categories. In the United States, women control almost three quarters (72%) of all dollars spent. So, all of this earning and purchasing power clearly begs the question &#8220;what do these women want?!?&#8221; Recent research provides some very actionable answers and advice:<span id="more-1440"></span></p>
<ul> <span style="font-weight: normal;"></p>
<li>They will spend more for goods and services of higher quality (65% food, 57% clothing, 56% facial skin care)</li>
<p><span style="font-weight: normal;"> </span></p>
<li>They demand products that deliver: time savings, fulfilling experiences, and emotional benefits</li>
<p><span style="font-weight: normal;"> </span></p>
<li>They give examples of brands that consistently meet their needs: Coach, Crème de la Mer, Adidas, Apple and Nike</li>
<p></span></ul>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="425" height="350" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/niRIyq3f4tM" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="350" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/niRIyq3f4tM"></embed></object></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: normal;">Our advice: keep your research sharply focused on the wants and needs of women as they related to your specific products and services. Otherwise, you may find yourself on the outside looking in on the very people who control the majority of every dollar that is spent.</span></p>
<p><strong>David Wilson<br />
CEO<br />
FGI Research</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fgiresearch.com/insights/what-do-women-want-3.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Effects of Order Bias on Price Elasticity Measurement</title>
		<link>http://www.fgiresearch.com/insights/the-effects-of-order-bias-on-price-elasticity-measurement.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.fgiresearch.com/insights/the-effects-of-order-bias-on-price-elasticity-measurement.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 13:56:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Insights in Action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market research analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research experts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thought leadership]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nemargut.com/fgitest/?p=1438</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a recent survey, FGI measured the potential price impact ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a title="Tweet This!" href="http://twitter.com/home?status=How does order bias impact price elasticity? Learn from the research experts: http://bit.ly/czoAiz via @fgiresearch" target="_blank"><img class="alignright" src="http://www.fgiresearch.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/tweetthis.png" alt="" width="62" height="53" /></a><span style="font-weight: normal;">In a recent survey, FGI measured the potential price impact of including recycled content in a paper product that had not previously been available with this content.  The intent was to measure the degree to which there was a change in respondents&#8217; expectations of price based on this alternative content.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: normal;">Traditionally, surveys are designed to present price options on a basic scale, without methodological regard to the order in which the price deltas are presented to the respondents.  In this survey, a random half of the respondents were presented the pricing variation choices from low-to-high (i.e. 30% less to 30% more), and the other half were presented the price variations in the opposite order (30% more to 30% less).</span><span id="more-1438"></span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: normal;"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-2784" src="http://www.fgiresearch.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/Dinos-graph.jpg" alt="" width="582" height="366" />Data from the “low-to-high” respondents skewed toward paying <span style="text-decoration: underline;">less</span> for the product, while data from the “high to low” respondents skewed toward paying <span style="text-decoration: underline;">more</span> for the products.  The same number said “about the same” in both cases; “about the same” was the midpoint of each scale. This finding reflects  a classic example of order bias.</span></p>
<p><strong>Dino Fire<br />
Director, Marketing Science<br />
FGI Research</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fgiresearch.com/insights/the-effects-of-order-bias-on-price-elasticity-measurement.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cash for Clunkers Aids Auto Makers</title>
		<link>http://www.fgiresearch.com/trendtruth/cash-for-clunkers-aids-auto-makers.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.fgiresearch.com/trendtruth/cash-for-clunkers-aids-auto-makers.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 22:26:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[TrendTruth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[automotive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer behavior]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nemargut.com/fgitest/?p=1335</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Using innovative mining techniques, FGI has been scanning social media ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://twitter.com/home?status=Is Cash for Clunkers actually good for automakers? http://bit.ly/conmD4 via @fgiresearch" title="Tweet This!" target="_blank"><img class="alignright" src="http://www.fgiresearch.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/tweetthis.png" alt="" width="62" height="53" /></a><span style="font-weight: normal;">Using innovative mining techniques, FGI has been scanning social media sites to unearth consumer insight in a variety of subjects. Michael Jackson&#8217;s recent death dominated the discussion, understandably. But FGI also found out this month that social media sites are abuzz with consumer talk about the &#8220;Cash for Clunkers&#8221; program. Even then, the frequency with which social media users talked about the term depended on demographics. Middle-aged people and Hispanics were less likely to be aware of the program, whereas other groups showed greater interest.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: normal;"><strong>Google Trends: &#8220;Cash for Clunkers&#8221; is &#8220;Volcanic&#8221;</strong></span></p>
<p>&#8220;Cash for Clunkers,&#8221; for those who are unfamiliar, is a government stimulus program that promises incentivies to trade in an inefficient &#8220;clunker&#8221; for a new, more fuel-efficient vehicle. News about and discussions involving this term have had a huge impact on social media. FGI Research noticed an enormous spike in blog traffic surrounding the subject, and Google Trends rated the term &#8220;Cash for Clunkers&#8221; as &#8220;Volcanic,&#8221; meaning it earned the top spot on their most-frequently-searched list.  Although this trend is spreading rapidly on the internet, the question for automakers is:  Is this social media trend really &#8220;volcanic&#8221; for all consumers, or do demographics make a difference?<span id="more-1335"></span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: normal;"><strong>Demographics: Look Who&#8217;s Talking</strong><br />
FGI Research turned to SmartPanel panelists to uncover who, exactly, was behind the demonstrated interest in &#8220;Cash for Clunkers.&#8221; We asked those surveyed if they were aware of the program. 82% of respondents said that they had heard of it, but we discovered that awareness depended on demographic factors; for example, 70% of Hispanics said they had heard of this program, as opposed to 84% for non-Hispanics.  There was also a significant drop in the awareness of people ages 31-34 (57%) when compared to the average respondent awareness (87%). Those between 35-44 and over 65 demonstrated the highest awareness of the program. More research into social media use by these demographic groups could reveal if they are also responsible for the spike in Internet traffic of the subject.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: normal;"><strong>Who Will Use the Program?</strong><br />
The study also included questions about who might benefit from &#8220;Cash for Clunkers.&#8221; Our results suggest that the future looks brighter for the auto industry.  Only 12% of respondents said that they had bought a car in the past six months, but 23% said that they planned to buy a car in the next six months.  Of respondents who had not bought a car in the past six months, and had not heard of “Cash for Clunkers” before taking the survey, 17% said that they were more likely to buy a new car after learning of the program.  It’s easy to see what a tremendous impact this government program has on the American consumer in terms of new car purchases. The chart below illustrates consumer sentiment on the subject of “Cash for Clunkers.”</span></p>
<p><img title="Cash For Clunkers" src="http://www.fgiresearch.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/TT003.gif" alt="Cash For Clunkers" width="676" height="331" /></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: normal;"><strong>Actionable Insights</strong><br />
We can take a number of insights away from this research. First, social media has demonstrated a powerful influence on consumer awareness of a subject, and a powerful ability to <em>reflect</em> consumer interest in that subject. People get information from social media, and they also express their views through social media, which means there are opportunities to use social media for marketing as well as research into marketing. FGI&#8217;s independent study suggests that &#8220;Cash for Clunkers&#8221; has great potential to positively impact auto purchases this year, yet only if all demographic groups are aware of it. Depending on who uses social media, companies could use it as a tool to reach every demographic effectively, inform them of the program, and so benefit from online marketing. More research into the demographics of social media use could further support those efforts.</span></p>
<p><strong>Next Steps You Can Take</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Learn more about the results of this study: complimentary access to the data in this report, including cross-tabulated results, is available upon request from FGI Research.</li>
<li>Contact FGI Research: click <a href="http://www.fgiresearch.com/wp-content/themes/wp-creativix/contact.php">here</a> or call us at (919) 929-7759</li>
<li>Explore FGI Research’s <a href="http://www.fgiresearch.com/solutions">market research solutions</a>, including <a href="http://www.fgiresearch.com/solutions/panels/custom-panels/">custom panels</a>, <a href="http://www.fgiresearch.com/research">full service research</a>, and our <a href="http://www.fgiresearch.com/solutions/panels/smartpanel">online sample</a> (SmartPanel).</li>
<li>Join FGI Research’s <a href="http://ld.fgiresearch.com/fgireportbuilder/sp/" target="_blank">online panel</a> to participate in future studies.</li>
</ul>
<p><span style="font-weight: normal;"> </span></p>
<p><strong>Survey Methods</strong><br />
<span style="font-weight: normal;">Date of Study: 7/31/2009<br />
Total Responders: 295<br />
Sample Source: <strong>FGI SmartPanel</strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: normal;">This nationally-representative sample consists of adults aged 18 and up and is balanced to the US population using recent census data. One can say with 95% confidence that the maximum margin of sampling error is ±4 percentage points.</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fgiresearch.com/trendtruth/cash-for-clunkers-aids-auto-makers.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

